One of the most interesting discussions in Unmasking the Powers concerns the angels of churches and the application of this idea in contemporary life.[1] This particular discussion is also one of the most Biblically grounded portions of the book, consisting of an extended commentary on Revelation 2-3. Wink believes that the so-called angels of the churches in Revelation introduce a way of looking at institutional spirituality that has application to governments, businesses, and non-profit organizations, which have certain spiritual characteristics that transcend a particular leader, group of leaders, or other institutional embodiment.

Not long ago, I talked to a friend about an organization I have known for over thirty years. He described it as having an atmosphere like a pirate ship! More than thirty years ago, I would have described the organization similarly under different leadership, with different employees, and even in another business climate. This story has an important lesson: One reason leaders must be careful about their spiritual character is that the spiritual component of their leadership may leave wounds or distortions that take many years to heal—if ever. One reason pastors should understand and deal with the spirituality of their congregations is that it matters more than next week’s sermon. The spirituality a pastor creates will outlive you for better or for worse. One reason businesses of all kinds need to address the spirituality of their organization is that the spirituality will be with the organization long after everyone involved is gone.

The Seven Churches

At the very beginning of the so-called “Letters to the Churches,” John writes: To the angel of the church in Ephesus write: These are the words of him who holds the seven stars in his right hand and walks among the seven golden lampstands (Rev. 2:1). The formula “To the angel of the church write” appears at the beginning of each letter. Earlier, John introduces the concept by writing:

I, John, your brother and companion in the suffering and kingdom and patient endurance that are ours in Jesus, was on the island of Patmos because of the word of God and the testimony of Jesus. On the Lord’s Day, I was in the Spirit, and I heard behind me a loud voice like a trumpet, which said: “Write on a scroll what you see and send it to the seven churches: to Ephesus, Smyrna, Pergamum, Thyatira, Sardis, Philadelphia and Laodicea.

I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands, and among the lampstands was someone like a son of man, dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest. The hair on his head was white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire. His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters. In his right hand he held seven stars, and coming out of his mouth was a sharp, double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.

When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last. I am the Living One; I was dead, and now look, I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades. Write, therefore, what you have seen, what is now and what will take place later. The mystery of the seven stars that you saw in my right hand and of the seven golden lampstands is this: The seven stars are the angels of the seven churches, and the seven lampstands are the seven churches (John 1:9-20).

The vision is of the risen Christ, who was dead but is now alive and has defeated death’s power. He holds seven stars in his hands and walks among seven lampstands. As the ending makes clear, the seven lampstands are the seven churches, and the seven stars are the angels of those churches.

Following his thesis on the nature of angelic beings, Wink sees seven church angels as the inner spiritual reality of the visible, concrete congregation being addressed. [2] It should be more or less evident to the reader that John’s use of the term “angels” in this context may be strictly metaphorical. That is to say, in this particular case, he is, in fact, directly stating that these churches have an inner spiritual reality. There is no separate “angelic person” involved.

One’s opinion about this matter depends upon one’s general feeling about the nature of the book of Revelation and about precisely who is being addressed. Many commentators have noted that the number seven was considered a perfect number to the Hebrews and that the churches mentioned may simply be representative of all of the churches of Asia Minor or, indeed, all the churches of the world. I favor the view that the book demonstrates in its entirety a kind of symbolic representation that leads credence to the view that the seven churches symbolize a larger number of churches. The seven churches represent the whole church of John’s Day and, by extension, speak directly to the church today.

This observation does not cancel Wink’s basic thesis. It is consistent with the notion that organizations have an inner spiritual reality. One reason it is important to understand the idea of an “angel of the churches” is that the concept of a church’s inner spiritual reality applies to other social organizations, including transnational corporations, military establishments, university systems, and government bureaucracies—every kind of social organization. [3]

This inner spirituality (or angel) is not separate from the institution but represents its spiritual totality. Yet, it is also personal. People create organizations, yet organizations reflect a separate, organic, individual nature distinct from those who make them up. This nature can only be described as a personality, i.e., a personal spirit.

 The personal address in Revelation suggests more than mere personification of an organization. [4] It is the actual spirituality of the congregation as an entity. As an organization’s corporate personality, it represents its spiritual totality. This spirituality does not exist separately from the institution but is not identical to any specific concrete expression of such an institution. [5] The angel of an institution, including a church, is connected with the material expression of the church’s life as its interiority.

I belong to a neighborhood association and serve on some of its committees. It was formed in 1973, just about the time I graduated from college. Most of the founders are either quite elderly or gone. Nevertheless, the inner spiritual reality of our neighborhood association is evident in nearly every meeting we have. Deep inside the DNA of our association is the notion that the neighborhood needs to be preserved in its original state as far as possible. There is a great fear of change or accommodation for new developments, such as solar electric units seen from the street. The fear of some people that this change is but the beginning of a series of changes that will compromise our status as one of San Antonio’s premier historic neighborhoods impacts every decision. That inner spiritual commitment affects everything we do. [6]

The Ambivalent Nature of Angels of the Churches

In ordinary language, we often speak of “guardian angels.” We think people have guardian angels. Sometimes, people talk of churches or other institutions having guardian angels. Indeed, the archangel Michael is seen as the guardian of Israel, the people of God, and the Christian church in general. It should be evident that when John talks about the angels of the churches, he is not talking about quite the same phenomenon. [7] Michael is entirely holy and good. Michael is wholly a servant of God. It’s evident from the message to the churches that the angels of the churches do not have this status. John consistently speaks of both aspects of the churches that are good and by God’s will and compromises the churches made that have taken it out of God’s will. In other words, the angels of the churches are a good bit like human beings in general. They have a capacity for good and for evil. [8] This is an aspect of social angels that Wink will discuss not just in Unmasking the Powers but in his final book, Engaging the Powers. His point is that the angels are fundamentally the creation of a good God, but like human beings, they have the capacity for diversion from their created potential.

Discerning the Angelic Spirit

A significant problem implicit in Wink’s analysis is the question, “How does one discern the inner spirit of a congregation or other organization?” We human beings have no direct access to the inner spirituality of any organization. We must rely upon external observation of the organization to understand its inner spirituality. Most helpfully, Wink does try to give some guidance in this area as regards congregations. He suggests the following areas of inquiry:

1. What is the nature of the congregation’s regular physical space for worship, prayer, and study?
2. What is the social status of the congregation? Is it primarily working class? Office workers? Executives? Retirees?
3. Where is power located in the congregation? The pastor? The governing board? The women of the church? The wealthiest member? A particular family?
4. How is power exercised in the congregation? Is it a dictatorship? Is it democratic? Do people compromise to reach decisions?
5. How is conflict handled? Is it submerged? Is it vocalized at the slightest opportunity? Is it healthy, or is it unhealthy?
6. What is the structure of any denomination? Is it connectional or centralized? Is there a bishop, or are the higher courts of the church democratic? How much input is given to local congregations?
7. How does the congregation see itself? Is it growing, helpless, declining, missional, inbred, or outgoing? [9]

Naturally, no simple analysis of one factor to the exclusion of others can give us a complete picture of the inner spirituality of a congregation or any other institution. No simple list can provide us with such insight. One of the problems with consultants is that they come in and gain a very superficial view of a congregation based on interviews, questionnaires, and other analyses. Inevitably, the perception of the current pastor plays a more significant role than any other perception. It takes time and effort to perceive the inner spirit of a congregation. I might add that a wise pastor takes the time to understand this inner spirit, not to criticize it, but to understand how to serve the local congregation best.

Healing the Spirit of a Congregation

As John’s introduction to Revelation and his letters to the churches exemplify, all churches have positive and negative characteristics. The question for leadership is how to maximize the positive elements of the spirit of the congregation and how to minimize the negative aspects. We have John’s letters to the seven churches but do not have John’s personal reflections garnered over time. We can assume that John regularly received reports about the congregations of Asia Minor. He probably also talked to visitors from many places and learned how their churches were doing. Ephesus was a major center of the Christian faith and a seaport. Before his captivity on Patmos, we can be sure he was aware of the condition of the churches. He prayed and reflected on what he ought to say to the churches. This gives us some insight into how faithful leaders can heal the angel of a church.

1. Courage to Speak Wisdom. First, there is the element of courage. John had to decide whether to send his revelation to the churches and how to say what needed to be said. Part of what he had to say was difficult to say without risking hurt feelings. John had to decide what to say and how to say it.
2. Praise for Accomplishments. The revelator found something in every church to praise. The churches in Ephesus had been faithful, long-suffering, patient, and persevered through testing. (Rev 2:1-2). The church in Smyrna had done excellent work despite poverty and oppression (v. 9). The angel of the Church of Pergamon had worked hard despite opposition from pagan deities (v. 13). The church at Thyatira had been hard-working, loving, faithful, service, and patient in tribulation (v. 19). The church at Sardis had a great history and name (.3:1). The church at Philadelphia had been a faithful congregation in every way.
3. Areas for improvement. The church in Ephesus had grown tired and lost its first love. The church of Smyrna tolerated the intolerable out of fear (2:8-11). The church in Pergamon permitted harmful teachings to infiltrate and was experiencing decline (2:12-15). The church in Thyatira allowed itself to be seduced into sexual immorality from which it needed to repent (vv. 20-21). Despite its history, The church at Sardis was a dead church and needed to be renewed (3:2). The church in Philadelphia needed to persevere (vv.10-11).

Those who lead churches or other organizations can learn much about their spirituality by pondering Walter Wink’s analysis of local congregations. It may not be perfect, but it is certainly illuminating. Ultimately, any leader’s most important legacy, for better or worse, is the spirituality they encourage in the church or organization they serve. At the same time, this spirituality profoundly impacts what can be accomplished in any organization. Next week, I will deal with the angels of the nations.

Copyright 2025, G. Christopher Scruggs, All Rights Reserved

[1] Unmasking the Powers: The Invisible Forces that Determine Human Existence (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1986).

[2] Id, at 70.

[3] Id, at 70.

[4]  Last week,  one reader found some of what I said regarding the personalities of angelic beings (particularly Satan and fallen angels) objectionable. When discussing the “personhood” of heavenly beings, it’s important to note that this concept isn’t easily understood. Human beings have bodies, physical emotions, and similar traits, highlighting that angelic personhood differs from human personhood. The key idea is that persons exist independently of one another and cannot be reduced to, for example, the writer’s or perceiver’s psychological states. I believe this is what Wink is addressing. The nature of angelic personhood is ultimately founded in the personal nature of God, who created a world in which personhood can develop.

[5] Id.

[6] I would not want my neighbors to think I am speaking against historic preservation. Indeed, one reason we purchased in our neighborhood was its historic character.

[7] Unmasking the Powers, 70.

[8] This particular insight is why I believe that the term “angels of the churches” reflects the use of “angel” metaphorically distinct from the use of the term when referring to “the Angel Michael,” who I take to referring to a personal revelation of the being of God in the form of a messenger to the human race.

[9] Unmasking the Powers, 71-78.